Showing 492 results

Archivistische beschrijving
Francis Llewellyn Griffith Collection
Print preview View:

1 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects

Notes on papyrus Boulaq 18

Notes on papyrus Boulaq 18 and relating to the preparation of Griffith, F. L. 1891. The account papyrus no. 18 of Boulaq, in Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 29, 102-116 (OEB 140707), including different versions of drafts.

Gurob Papyrus Fragment A

Hieroglyphic transcription of Gurob papyrus fragment A (recto and verso). Not published.
Hieroglyphic transcriptions of Gurob papyri I.1 and III.1 on reverse of pages. Published in plates xxxviii and xxxix of Griffith, Francis Llewellyn 1898. The Petrie papyri: hieratic papyri from Kahun and Gurob (principally of the Middle Kingdom). 2 vols. London: Quaritch (OEB 140786).

Griffith Notebook "Gamaiyemi and Nebesha, 1885-6"

Notes by Griffith on the archaeology of Nabesha (Tell Farꜥun) [TopBib 401-150] & Tell Gumaiyima [TopBib 401-160]:

-Front Cover: Contents page of notebook.
-p1: Erased notes concerning tombs(?). Sketch, with scale, of SW corner “foundation deposit” (as labelled in contents) detailing platters, plaques and short and long pots (from Temple of Aahmes).
-p2: Sketch map locating Tell Faraûn, Gamaiyemi, a central “stone tomb” on the southern mound of Zuwelên, the northern mound of Zuwelên and Tell Sân.
-p3: Detail sketch map of southern mound of Zuwelên detailing stone tomb of 26th Dynasty on the SE end of the mound, and labelling 300 yards of tombs.
-p4-6: Southern mound of Zuwelên. Notes and calculations concerning tombs (presumably from southern mound of Zuwelên).

Gumaîyima [TopBib 401-160]
Gumaîyima. SE Enclosure.
-p8-9: Detailed sketch map of the SE enclosure (Temenos) with measurements, matching publication.
-p10-11: Sketch map locating find spots of artefacts (in Temenos) with reference to a “NE find point”. e.g. Ptah and Osiris figures (noted on page 16 also).
-p12: Notes and calculations concerning workmen(?).
-p13: Sketch, with scale, of NW corner “foundation deposit” (as labelled in contents) (presumably from Temenos). Reference at top of page to “14 pages on” (i.e. page 27).
-p14: Notes and calculations concerning workmen(?).
-p15: 1st March. Notes concerning discovery of fragments of mosaic within the enclosure, a portion still in situ with bronzes at side. Accompanying sketch of bronzes. Notes concerning limestone chips beneath two kneeling royal statues, various fragments of bronze hooks and other mosaic fragments.
-2nd March. Note concerning the discovery of the foundation of a pillar during work on the East wall.
-p16: Dairy notes concerning Tuesday 2; bronzes at NE corner (of Temple).
-Dairy notes concerning Wednesday 3; copying inscriptions from basalt sarcophagus in “great tomb”, and similar sarcophagus in “great limestone tomb on N side.”; Foundation deposit in SE corner of centre chamber and mosaic in NE; Ptah Osiris and hinge found at NE corner of enclosure (Temenos).
-Dairy notes concerning Thursday 4; work at Zuwelên south tracing mosaic; foundation deposits in gateway foundation as at Nabêsha; artefacts: two porcelain plaques, mortar, grindstones; NW apparently broken up; SW corner deposit scattered; artefacts: two plaques, grindstone and broken mortar.

Nabêsha (Tell Farꜥûn) [TopBib 401-150] & Gumaîyima [TopBib 401-160]
-p17: Dairy notes concerning Friday 5; excavation of square at south Gamaiyemi of “late Roman?”; work no south wall producing several moulds “(for glass?)” in limestone; bronze portion of headdress from SE corner; four long bronze rods; glass mosaic hawk.
-Dairy notes concerning Saturday 6; return to Nebesheh and arrival of Petrie.
-Dairy notes concerning Sunday 7; returned to Gamaiyemi with Petrie.
-p18-19: Notes concerning tomb measurements (some numbered).

Gumaîyima [TopBib 401-160]
-p20: Sketch, with measurements, and notes concerning “Gateway Gemaiyemi” on the west wall of the Temenos; Brick wall plastered. Foundation deposits in NE, SE, SW corners much disturbed. NW wall broke away.
-p21: Diary notes concerning Monday 8; work halted by midday due to wind and sand; bronze (?) found in NE chambers with a “rough Bes (Roman)” (presumably from chamber between the central building and the S enclosure wall referenced in publication).
-Diary notes concerning Tuesday 9; finds of various plaster “limestone(?)” moulds for glass in S central chambers, a “pair of seals?”, poor plaster casts in a heap in centre E and SW corner; deposit of (?), no grindstones, two stones coloured green(?).
-Diary notes concerning Wednesday 10; NW corner finds; grindstones, plaques, number of fine glass hieroglyphs found in limestone rubbish (presumably from chamber between the central building and the S enclosure wall referenced in publication).
-p22: Notes and calculations concerning workmen and pay(?).
-p23: Diary notes concerning Thursday 11; excavation of NE corner and wall itself, with finds; glass fragments, bronze hooks (found in filling) – deepest object yet found.
-p24: Notes and calculations concerning workmen and pay(?).
Sketch of “central deposit” with measurements of group of five platters (sketch of six platters [plates] crossed-through).
-p26: List of workmen.
-p27: Sketch in greater detail of NW corner “foundation deposit” (Temenos and Temple). Objects located on sketch are referenced in notes with letters; small, short and long platters, “socketed fas”, plaques (deposited beneath the large platters).
-Reference at top of page to “14 pages back” (i.e. page 13).
-p30: Sketch and orientation of four bronze rods and “eagle” of mosaic found in a shallow trench through surface rubbish. Deposit of beads also sketched. Note concerning rings of yellow crystalline(?) molten(?) (silver?) at intervals of 1½” along the rods (publication references blue porcelain rings).
-p31: 3D(?) reconstruction(?) sketch of bronze rods complete with rings (panels having perished).
-p32: Sketch of W wall with notes and measurements concerning the thickness of the “wall deposit”, size of bricks, and layering of sand between bricks (presumably relevant to notes on West wall of “Temple of Uarti” in plate xiv).
-p33: Notes concerning find of limestone blocks, with measurements.
-p34-45: Calculations concerning workmen’s pay.
-p46: Pay calculations concerning a workman and notes and calculations concerning postage.

Nabêsha (Tell Farꜥûn) [TopBib 401-150] & Gumaîyima [TopBib 401-160]
-p51 [facing]: Sketch map, with orientation, showing location of tombs in relation to “enclosure Gemaiyemi”(?) (central point on sketch map).

Historical Notes
-p51: Two leaves removed prior to renumbering of page 51, at least three containing lecture notes(?).
-Page of lecture notes(?) concerning “great Rameses who at the end of a severe campaign in the (?) of Syria concluded a treaty with the Hittites married the daughter of the ruler and abandoning the policy of his predecessors” and the relationship of the Hyksos to the Hittites. Discussion of a Hittite inscription which will provide a link between “the great Empire of Asia and of Africa”.

Gumaîyima [TopBib 401-160]
-p52-53: Location sketch of Temple within Temenos with scale and overlaid grid.
-NW, SW and SE corner deposits marked with depth noted, no deposit in NE corner.
-Shallow pit located as well as “fragments of sculpture trial pieces” in SW proximity.
-NE area contains locations of; “Roman rubbish”, “Isis(?)”, bronze (?), queen with (?).
-SE area contains locations of; plaster figures, large jar, “2 stools(?)”, glass fragments.
-p55: Four preceding leaves removed, at least three of which contained what were presumably lecture notes as before (must have been ripped out prior to continuing notes as the next sequential page is renumbered accordingly).
-Sketch of rectangular structure(?) with measurements and accompanying calculations.
-p62-65: Lists of workmen and accompanying pay calculations.

Nabêsha (Tell Farꜥûn) [TopBib 401-150]
Nabêsha (Tell Faraûn) Temenos.
-p67: Sketch with accompanying notes of inscription of the west door jamb of the “Shrine of Uati” within Temple of Aahmes in the Temenos. Comments about the inscription; “fine shallow cutting” and measurements of the length of signs.

-p68-97: Lists of workmen and accompanying pay calculations.

-p98: Location map with orientation and approximate distances between Gemaiyemi, tombs far south of and around Zuwelên and the San in the north in relation to Zuwelên (central location of map).
-p99: Location map with undefined central point referencing “small town mound” to the NW and “tombs” as well as “opened tombs” to the W and SW, with approximate scale.

-p100: Notes and calculations concerning; “Cases of Antiquities”, “uninscribed or rough shabti”, and miscellaneous calculations.

-Back Cover: List of workmen and accompanying pay calculations for Gemaiyemi.

Griffith Notebook Nebesheh, etc.

Notes by Griffith on the archaeology of El-Qanṭara (Tell Abû Seifa) [TopBib 401-120] & Tell Dafana (Daphnae) [TopBib 401-130] & Bibliographical Notes

El-Qanṭara (Tell Abû Seifa) [TopBib 401-120]
-Front Cover: Contents page of notebook.
-p1: “Accounts” page with lists of expenses of Griffith and Petrie April 15-19.

-p2: Copy of Roman inscription.

-p3: List of expenses April 25-27 and May 3rd.
-p4-5: List of workers and wages assigned to each.
-p6: List of expenses 3rd May and 8-9 May.
-p7: List of expenses 14-15 May and 18th May.

-p8: Sketch of two square bases and one “lion” in relation to one another and their orientation. Presumably those mentioned in publication as “Ramesside blocks”, “square limestone base” and “recumbent lion”.
-p9: Note; “Qantarah mound = Tell abu Sêfre” (El-Qanṭara and Tell Abû Seifa of TopBib iv.6).
p9reverse: Notes, including measurements, and inserted sketches of two built-features in the Kom.
-p9a: Crossed-through note.
-p10: Notes, including orientation and exposure time, for 4 numbered photographs.
-p12-13: Notes and calculations concerning workmen.
-p14: Notes on bearings; “from a high spot E of Qantara” and “from Tell al Her”(Tel el Hér in -publication), including orientations to other features of the landscape.

-p15: Crossed-through notes and calculations concerning workmen.

-p16: Notes on “cemetery E valley”; “pot burials”, “bones”, “skeletons” and “Roman amphora”.
-p18: Notes and orientations of surrounding landscape and built features; from “low strip around end of Pelusian mound”, “from NW corner of mound” and transect of features “going Eastwards”.
-p19: Copy of unlabelled inscription not in publication.
-p20-22: Continuation, from end of page 18, of description of landscape and built features “going eastwards”, presumably the mound described is Qantara. Features described include; “W wall of Arch citadel”, gateways, brickwork, “columns”, some of which were “half buried” and blocks of granite - all distances and orientations labelled in relation to one another.

-p23: Calculations.
-p24: Numerical list of items.
-p25: Crossed-through notes concerning workmen.

Tell Dafana (Daphnae) [TopBib 401-120]
-p28: Copy of inscription from “sandstone block at Menaget el Kebire”(El Menâgi of publication), “south of cemetery”, including block measurements. A further note mentions a granite block on west side.

-p30: Note concerning boxes and letters.
-p31: Index of cases 1-22 detailing contents.

El-Qanṭara (Tell Abû Seifa) [TopBib 401-130]
-p32-37: Preliminary draft of articles 96.-98. in publication, with alterations subsequently made.
-p40: Preliminary draft of article 99. in publication, with alterations subsequently made.
-p42: Draft of description of visiting “Farama” from “Qantarah”, presumably for publication.
-Preliminary draft of article 100. in publication, description of Tel el Faḍḍa and Tel el Ḥêr.
-p43: Draft of the end of article 99. in publication, description of “Medieval Fort”.
-p44-46; 48; 50: Preliminary draft of further content of article 100. in publication, description of Tel Ḥabwe and Tell Abû Seifa [“Tell abu Sêfe”] (el-Qanṭara [“el Qadym”]).
Multiple alterations subsequently made as well as omissions from the publication.
-p52: Brief note; “distance being 22(?) miles was a straight–line”.
-p54: Note concerning; “Nebesheh temple bricks in antechamber”.

-p56: Expenses list for May 20-22.

-p59: Corpus d orientalists(?) (bibliographical reference to).
-p60: Tiele, Devéria, Quaterirre(?) (select bibliographies of).
-p61: Pleyte & Lieblein (select bibliographies of).
-p63: Piégut(?), Rosei(?), Gribaut &Rosellini (select bibliographies of).
-p65: Naville, Goodwin & Chabas (select bibliographies of).
-p67: Reference to a Zeitschrift article.
-p69: Birch & Lepsius (select bibliographies of).
-p71: Champollion le Jeune & Champollion-Figeac (select bibliographies of).
-p73: Ebers (select bibliography of).
-p75: Maspero (select bibliography of).
-p77: Mariette (select bibliography of).
-p79: Rougé & Wilkinson (select bibliographies of).
-p80a-80c: Duemichen (select bibliography of).
-p80e: Brugsch (Heinrich) (select bibliography of).

-p80f: Crossed-through notes and calculations.

El-Qanṭara (Tell Abû Seifa) [TopBib 401-130]
-p80g: Notes concerning the surrounding areas of the “Pelusium E mound”, “Arab fortress”, -“high hill Abul Aruq” and “Tell Her” with distances and orientations measured. First seems to be content of article 99. in publication whereas second two sections are unclear.
-p82-83: Note concerning; “May 20. Zagagig.”
-Cat cemetery at NW side of “Kom Qaithen(?)”.
-Temple in depression in middle of southern half. Few inscribed granite blocks.
-On E outside town, remains of mummies in wall, late tombs, Ptolemaic & Roman in vaults or square chambers on outside of wall.

-p86: List of calculations.

Nabêsha (Tell Faraûn) [TopBib 401-150]
-p87: List of workmen and values with total for Nabêsha [“Nebesheh”].
-p88: Notes concerning; measured distances “from about 1mile SW of Pelusium mound” of landscape features, e.g. “break in low mounds” and “opening between mounds”. Presumably features described are near Nabêsha.

El-Qanṭara (Tell Abû Seifa) [TopBib 401-130]
-p90: Notes on two squeezes which entered article 101. in publication. Transcriptions of inscriptions translated in the article relating to Prisse Monuments xix.
-p92-93: Sketch of inscriptions of “back”, “right” and “left” side of Prisse Monuments xix, as translated in article 101. in publication.
-p94: Notes concerning; “limestone base in temple”, measurements of the mound and note in French.
-p95: Note concerning; “five pieces of inscribed sandstone lion found” and descriptions and comments on each fragment as well transcribed hieroglyphs.
-p96-97: Description and transcription of hieroglyphs from “monument in Qantareh” – “w. Side = back”, “N side” and “base S. side” & “N. side”. (not in publication).
-p98-99: Sketch map “from (?) Tell NE of Qantarah Tell el Her?” with “canal”, “former lake”, “low ground” and “Pelusium?” labelled.
-p100: Note concerning; bricks from Tell el Her, Tell Semut, Tel el Hir(?) and descriptions of landscape features in relationship to these and also “old Qantara” and “Qantareh”.

-Back Cover: Lists of workmen and expenses calculations.

Griffith Notebook Nebesheh

Notes by Griffith on the archaeology of Nabêsha (Tell Far’ûn) [TopBib 401-150] & the ‘Griffith Chronology’ (historical notes)

Nabêsha (Tell Far’ûn) [TopBib 401-150]
-pFront Cover: Contents page of notebook. “Ushabti inscriptions Nebesheh 2-7”, “stone inscription 84-87”, “demotic on pot 95” & “stone inscriptions 97”.
-Notes and accompanying transcriptions for “Ushabti bought in Cairo 1885” and “scarab Cairo 1885” (with measurements).
-p1: Draft of presumably what was to be an introduction to the publication article on the Ushabtis.
-Notes on Ushabtis numbered one to five with erasures of notes of original numberings 5, 6 & 5 again discovered to be from the same, and not a different, tomb.
-1) “unpainted” of “Pa vā Harmachis” 1spec. 2) “Pamakau Tomb 35. 2 spec.”. 3) “NeXtamen” 6 spec. tomb (presumably) 31. 4) “ramesnaXb. Tomb 3”. 5) “PateXn. tomb 41”.
-p2: Notes with descriptions of and transcriptions from Ushabtis from various tombs.
-“Ushabti tomb 5, red clay.” Inscription “on back, two lines” (in hieratic), pl ii Ushabti 5 in publication, with inscription unpublished.
-“tomb 5” inscription “on front” (in hieratic).
-“tomb 8 sandstone” inscription “horizontal round side & back”, pl ii Ushabti 8 (sandstone) in publication.
-“tomb 12 saite” inscription unpublished.
-“tomb 11, saite horizontal” inscription unpublished. “Four specimens with several Hundred(?)”.
-“tomb 20(a)”partial(?) under glaze, large, 2 horizontal & vertical”, inscription unpublished. “(b) small, one line down front”, inscription unpublished.
-p3: Numbered list of Ushabtis marked “general”, potentially the unprovenanced Ushabtis featuring on p33 of the publication. Notes include a description, some are transliterated, and all feature a transcription.
-“(1) small Saite style inscription”.
-“(2) small Saite on front”.
-“(3) from hosh(?) in town on S side of mound, fine impressed”.
-“(4) in one line down front”
-“(5) from small surface of rubbish of a destroyed tomb No. 56 on N slope of S high mound”
-“7. large incised, horizontal lines”
-“8. very rough” “a. down back” & “b. down back” and “on side”.
-p4: Notes, some transliteration, and transcriptions of texts from provenanced Ushabtis.
-“tomb3 stumpy porcelain inscriptions inlaid in colour under glaze down front” (featured in pl.ii Ushabti 3 in publication).
-“tomb 4 limestone insc. incised horizontal, begin apparently on middle of breast” (not in publication).
-“tomb31, 6 shabti yellow, painted inscription under glaze, round finishing in a limestone back” (inscription features in transliteration on page 32 of publication).
-“on surface outside destroyed mudbrick chamber 35 – 2 limestone painted inscriptions apparently in two vertical lines down side and front”. Features two cursive inscriptions “of one” and “on back and side of other”.
-“41.” “earthenware painted” (not in publication).
-p5: Page labelled “general”, presumably continued from page 3.
-“9. small (?)work inscription on line across head”.
-“10. On back of small figure” “terracotta impressed from cooler mould”.
-p6: Transliteration and transcription of inscriptions from provenanced Ushabtis; two from tomb 39. one from tomb 50. and four from tomb 49.

‘Griffith Chronology’
-p9: Page titled “Sketch of History”. Beginning a long collection of notes on the chronology of Egyptian history from Dynasty I to XXV.
-‘Griffith Chronology’ - crossed through notes on “Lower Egypt” and its nomes and beginning of notes on the “Prehistoric period” and from “the accession of Menes”.
-p10: ‘Griffith Chronology’ - side note to content on page 11; concerning the “double title” and “double crown” with reference to “the two lands”.
-p11: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – end of description of Upper Egyptian nomes and further comments on division of Egypt and its relationship to the double title and double crown of the king.
-p12: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – side note to content on page 13; “Sem em Ptah is rightly used in suggestion of Memphis”.
-p13: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – description of the designation of Upper Egypt and beginning of notes by Dynasty.
-Dynasty I; discussion of Mantheo’s writing that Menes’ capital was based at Memphis (with footnotes).
-p15: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – Dynasty II & III; names of kings and localities attested in. Conclusion on the importance of Memphis Dynasty I-III (with footnotes).
-p17: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – Dynasty IV; discussion of this “brilliant dynasty” with specific reference to the achievements of Snefru (with footnotes).
-p19: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – Dynasty V; notes on attestations of Dynasty V monuments solely in Memphite necropolises and names of kings. Dynasty VI; discussion of Pepi I & II attested in monuments outside the Memphite region.
-p21: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – notes concerning location of the capital. List of brief notes on; Dynasty VII; “Memphite” “of utmost obscurity”, VIII; “Memphite” “little evidence of the state of the Delta”, IX; “Heracleopolitan” “This kingdom has left monuments”, X; “Heracleopolitan” “titles simplifying this rule over the two”. XI; “Theban” is followed by a table with lists of its kings, their muonuments in Upper and Lower Egypt and their achievements noted.
-p23: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – accompanying notes to the table of Dynasty XI rulers, first half being crossed through. Discussion of the god Montu with relation to the Montuhoteps and Dynasty XI and likewise of Hershefe with relation to the Heracleopolitan dynasties.
-p25: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of page 23; reference to a basalt scribal statue from “Nebesheh” of “Amunhotep who was priest of Montu, lord of An”. Significance is explained as “evidence of city in the E of the Delta important in the time of the Ramesside, to which period the monument may be attributed.”
-Discussion of whether “this Northern Hermonthis” being “Northern Heracleopolis” and that the war god Montu was the equivalent of Heracles, with the explanation of a parallel.
-p27: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of discussion from page 25 of family from Northern Heracleopolis intermarrying with the Antefs who ruled at Thebes.
-Discussion of the Abydos kinglist and chronology therein of Dynasty XI-XII; “the antefs being omitted” (with footnote). Dynasty XI; “Theban legitimacy doubtful Antefs fraud line through marriage with princes”. Dynasty XI; “put down by XII”.
-p28: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – side note to content on page 29; “the tribute brought by the Asiatic Abša & received by Xnumhetep is worth noting as an importance of dealings with the peoples on the Eastern border of the Delta.”
-p29: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – conclusion on previous pages of the ‘Chronology’ summarising the most powerful dynasties and their attestations in the monumental record.
-Dynasty XII; “Theban”, reference to the monuments of Amenemhat I, “Useretsen III” (especially those at Tanis and Nebesheh) and also Amenemhat III & IV.
-Dynasty XIII; “Theban”, reference to statue of Sebekhotep III.
-Dynasty XIV; “Xoite” “scarcely any monuments remain”.
-p31: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of notes from page 29 of monuments of Dynasty XIV, “The remainder of the 150 kings or more cannot be traced in Lower Egypt” while the first 50 kings monuments are attested at Coptos, Thebes and Abydos, “The remainder have left no monuments”.
-Closing remark as to whether they ruled at Xois or were “driven from the Delta by the Hyksos” “one cannot yet determine”.
-Dynasty XV, XVI; “Hyksos” Josephus quoting Manetho represents the Hyksos invasion as a sudden interruption of pastoral people into Lower Egypt”, “pillaging & burning” and choosing a king to “who took up residence in Memphis”. Reference to fortification of eastern border “against expected invasion by the Assyrians(?)”.
-p33: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of discussion of Dynasties XV & XVI; “The first 6 kings were constantly at war endeavouring to crush the native power throughout Egypt.” “500 years” after the invasion the Theban kings eventually drove them into Avaris. Reference to “Thummosis” making terms and being “allowed to quit Egypt safely”.
-Final note regarding the two accounts of Josephus with regard to the founding of Avaris, either as a fort of the Hyksos against the Assyrians or as their last refuge in Egypt.
-p35: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – crossed through note regarding the first dynasty of Hyksos kings. Discussion of little evidence to first kings due to destruction by the “barbarous warfare”.
-Notes on localities of monuments that have been discovered, the last of which is crossed through.
-Dynasty XVII; “Theban, the Sekenenra family of Theban kingship perhaps paying tribute to the Hyksos” and “contemporary with them” (crossed through note that the Sekenenra family had been subject to the Hyksos).
-p37: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of notes from page 35 that Sallier Papyrus I evidencing that the last one or two kings of this line began the war “which ended in the Hyksos being shut up in their capital and eventually driven out of Egypt”, with further reference to monuments at Abu Roaš.
-Dynasty XVIII; “Theban”, list of monuments of this dynasty in Lower Egypt of “Aahmes I”, “Thothmes I”, “Thothmes III”, “Thothmes IV”, “Amen III”, “Amenophis IV”. End of discussion about expulsion of the Hyksos not until 5th year of “Aahmes”.
-p39: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of discussion on page 37; Aahmes’ supposed campaigns to Nubia and “numerous wars were carried out in Syria by all the successors of Aahmes”. Discussion that the kings were “too much engaged in warfare and in decorating Thebes” to pay attention to the rest of the country. Reference to the “revolt at Buto under Thothmes I”.
-Notes concerning the importance placed upon Memphis and Heliopolis by the kings of the Dynasty.
-p41: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of notes on page 39; closing comments about “Thothmes III” and “Amehophis II”.
-Dynasty XIX; “Theban”, discussion of the absence of monuments of Ramses I and how Set I “spread them farther than any of his predecessors”, with sites referenced. Beginning of comments about Ramses II; “Ramses II placed his name & his monuments in every place which his predecessors had decorated” (with footnote).
-p43: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of list of sites containing monuments of Ramses II from page 41, including; “Nebeše”, “Qantara” and “Kom el Hisn”. Further discussion of location of monuments of the king, the “most remarkable” being; “1) the spread of monuments into the W delta for the first time”, “2) the restoration of Tanis on a splendid scale” & “3) the reoccurrence of monuments” along the canal “said to have been begun by Sesotris”.
-p45: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – discussion of the ‘invasion’ of Egypt in the 5th year of Merenptah from the west “by a formidable horse of Libyan peoples” “apparently settling permanently in the land”. Notes as to the geography of the west Delta and why it was attractive for settlement.
-p47: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – closing remarks on the lack of monuments in the west Delta and reference to sites where monuments of Merenptah are attested. Brief reference to Seti II who “fortified the E. frontier”, though “his monuments are known only at Heliopolis in Lower Egypt” with “Those of Siptah V ... are not found in Lower Egypt.”
-Dynasty XX; “Theban”, discussion of incursions of “Syrians ... into the Delta and into Upper Egypt during the end of the last dynasty”. Discussion of “Setnecht” and his relation to his partial namesake in Dynasty XIX, who “may well have been a Theban, freed the land from the Syrian yoke.” References made to his name attested on various monuments, including “a sphinx at Nebešeh” which “has been usurped by him”.
-p49: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – “Rameses III”, discussion of his title “Heq An”, given to him by his father when he was coregent, and his “conflict with the Libyans tribes” in his 5th year, 8th year “land and water fight” against “Asiatic tribes” and attack of the Libyans again in the 11th year.
-Discussion of Rameses III’s donations to temples and reference to his attestations at “Tanis” and “Nebeše” among other sites.
-Brief notes on the monumental attestations of Rameses IV, V, VI, IX, XIII & XIV.
-p51: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – XXI; note concerning the discussion as to whether there were two dynasties reigning contemporaneously “or whether the Priests of Amun ruled the two lands.” Equation of Manetho’s kinglist with monuments at Tanis and discrepancies with monuments in Upper Egypt. Conclusion that “The Theban names undoubtedly belong to a family of Theban high priests of whom cannot be of Tanite origin.”
-Table of names of “Theban” and “Tanite” rulers laid out side-by-side with one another.
-Further conclusion; “Thus the two(?) Families are intimately mingled”.
-p53: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – conclusion of discussion on Dynasty XXI; “thus we conclude that there was only on dynasty reining at the time.” As “if these had been contemporary dynasties there probably would not have been such considerable monuments as remain at Thebes & Tanis of this period.”
-Dynasty XXII; “Bubastite”, brief not that other than Manetho there “is not much reason to believe in its Bubastite origin” with “The names of the king and of their ancestors point to an original Libyan derivation”, with reference to monumental attestations.
-Discussion of “Sh.I”(Sheshonq) campaign in Palestine and “Usurped sphinx from Tanis?”. Notes crossed through and brief note about “Usorkon I” statues.
-p55: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of notes on Dynasty XXII; sites that “Usorkon II” and “Sheshonke II” built in. Brief note on “Takelt II” fighting against invasion and that he built at Serapeum. Further list of king’s names and where they are attested; “Sheshonke III”, “Pimai”, “Sh. IV.” all at Serapeum described as “a series of long & principally inactive reigns.”
-Dynasty XXIII; “Tanite”, reference to how “the names Pe du Bast & Ta tu Bast (the mother of Osorkon III) show that these kings continued their close connection with Bubastis”. Note that “the last king is probably the same as the Osorkon King of Bubastis” who divided Egypt at the time of PianXi’s invasion. Discussion of family ties of the kings with “Heracleopolis & Hermopolis magna”.
-p57: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – close to discussion of “PianXi’s” influence on Egypt, from page 55, and how he extracted tribute. List of names of “the petty kings” and where they were kings of (some in transliteration, others in Anglicized form – presumably taken from ‘Piye’s Victory Stela)’.
-p59: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of discussion of Dynasty XXIII concerning; “TefnaXt of Sais” who “put himself at the head of revolt & made himself master of the whole of the Delta ... as far as Heracleopolis”. Discussion of the response of “PianXi” and his campaign, the capture of Memphis and how “TefnaXt who had fled to the marshes was easily brought to obedience.”
-Notes concerning the admission of “chiefs” to the “king’s tent to do homage to him” and reflection that “PianXi’s account of this invasion is very remarkable”, treating rebels with “utmost consideration”, “to avoid bloodshed whenever possible.” As well as that “PiankXi was no doubt of Egyptian origin &worshipped Egyptian gods & the account of this treatment of the country is very different from those by which the Pharaoh’s loved to describe their warlike deeds in foreign lands” (continues on page 61).
-p60: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – side note to content on page 61; “with him [Shabaka] ally king of Gaza. This is the first certain notice we have of an alliance of the Egyptians with a foreign although numerous had been common.”
-p61: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – continuation of commentary of the rule of “PianXi” with conclusion that; “How far this treatment secured the alliances of the people is difficult to ascertain.” Note that after “PianXi” returned to “Ethiopia he left no further monument of importance.”
-Dynasty XXIV; “Saite”, brief note that “Bak en ranf” “Probably of the same family as TefnaXt”, “known only by his interment in his 6th-year”
-Dynasty XXV; “Ethiopian”, discussion of the invasion and settling of “Shabaka”, building at Memphis, conflict with Sargon “on the borders of Philistia”, his defeat and how afterwards he sought the friendship of the Assyrian king. Discussion of “Shabatok” and his “unsuccessful warfare with Sennacherib” and his attestations in monuments at Memphis.
-p[82]: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – brief note; “This list & that of PianXi shows the importance that the Delta was gradually acquiring”. Followed by a list of place names which correspond to transliterated names on the facing page (83).
-p83: ‘Griffith Chronology’ – commentary on how “Taharka put down Šabatok in his 12th-year” and made an alliance with the Phoenicians, how “Assarhaddon ... assisted by the Arabs reached Egypt” and Taharqa’s flight to the south with the capture of Memphis and Thebes.
-Note followed by list of transliterated names, “The land was then divided under 20 governors the following is the list” (corresponding to place names on the facing page [82]).

Nabêsha (Tell Far’ûn) [TopBib 401-150]
-p84: List of copied hieroglyphic inscriptions and notes on the material of monument’s fragment “from temple”:
-“a. grey granite” fragment of nswt-bity.
-“b. Limestone” fragment of wAst.
-“c. syenite (rose)” fragment of mr-n-ptH.
-“d. limestone” fragment of cobra with uraeus.
-“e. Basalt fragment of left side of back inscription on statue” several signs.
-“f. Limestone left leg advanced” “2 lines on side illegible” with inscription “on back” (1:2,12 of publication’s pl x).
-p85: “g. grey granite” “portion of altar?” a few signs and suggested reconstruction.
-“h. grey granite front of top”, later crossed-through and redrawn on pages 86-87.
-“i. Back of basalt statue Nectanebo’s style” (1:2,11 of publication’s pl x).
-p86-87: “h. grey granite” drawing of the “altar” reproduced in publication’s pl ix (1:9,1.a) with notes for reproducing relief at a later stage.
-p91: Crossed-through notes concerning the attribution of a stela, and the shrine contemporary with it, to Amasis rather than the 12th Dynasty (presumably “the small temple” of Nabêsha).
-p94-95: Copy of an inscription “demotic a pot from surface of SE hôshes. one written over another which is partly erased” (presumably from one of the pot fragments noted in publication).
-p94: Inventory of “Boston 6 boxes” noting contents of:
-“the small one 10 contains frags of complete amphora”.
-“L1 Defeneh pottery, 600-550BC”.
-“The Case 20. contains Gemayemi & Nebesheh shards”.
-“The pottery in all type specimens from Nebesheh”
-“There is also \besides of cases/ a crate contains limestone head of Ramses & a specimen of (?) and wrappings”.
-Copies of four cartouches and epithets (not featured in publication).
-p95: Copies of three lines and one column of hieroglyphic inscription (presumably from shabtis as with other texts in pl xiii).
-p96: List of copied hieroglyphic inscriptions and notes on the material:
-“inscription general. Nebesheh”.
-“a. limestone slab, line down centre” (publication’s pl x[14]) “N.B. if Saite, important as hinting at local worship of Amen after Ramesside period.”.
-“b. (not purchased) limestone fragment” several ḥm signs.
-“c. basalt fragment from town S.W.” various signs.
-“d. sandstone” various signs.
-“e. base & feet of statue left foot advanced (so male). Nectanebo(?)” (corresponding to publication’s pl x 13.a & 13.b).
-p97: “f. basalt crouching figurine hands crossed over ? sloped knees” (corresponding to publication’s pl x 15a, black granite statue of Amenhotep) inscription “on skirt in front” with further drawing of inscription “on base” (corresponding to publication’s pl x 15b).
-“g. sandstone fragments from town”, fragment of nswt-bity ḫꜥ -[kꜣw]-rꜥ.
-“h. basalt fragment from surface large tomb in mound E of cemetery with foundation mortar”, four signs.

-pBack Cover: “evidence of local mayor”
-“(1) local workshop”
-“(2) king of upper and lower Egypt”
-“(3) monuments spot”
-“(4) passages through lands”
-“(5) classical votives”
-“(6) names occurring”

Resultaten 91 tot 120 van 492